www.homeorealhelp.ru

[Алёна]

Здравствуйте!
На крыше нашего дома сегодня установили новые антенны сотовой связи, направленные аккурат на квартиры, по виду очень мощные...
Насколько это вредно и опасно?

[Олегович]

Нужно пригласить специалистов из СЭС и произвести замер поля.

Олегович
_________________
Все не так просто. Все просто не так!
*****
P.S. Да! ВОРЧЛИВЫЙ - это я!!!

[Leana]

Существующим законодательством ЗАПРЕЩЕНА установка ретрансляторов и прочего оборудования сотовой связи на ЖИЛЫХ домах. В случае такого прецедента Вы при наличии доказательств (фото) можете требовать от компании-собственника данного оборудования предоставления Вам нового жилья (есть успешные прецеденты), так как это медленная смерть - постоянное облучение, которое усиливается в зависимости от времени дня - то есть нагрузки данной сети. Подробнее Вы сможете ознакомиться о вреде таких вышек и подобного оборудования на сайте electricsense( доказательная база). Чувство постоянной усталости, сонливость, головные боли, последующие неизлечимые хронические заболевания вам гарантированы.

[Leana]

У лиц, проживающих близ базовых станций связи, фиксируются следующие показатели ЖАЛОБ нейрологического характера:
головная боль (23.5%),
изменения памяти (28.2%),
тошнота (18.8%),
тремор (9.4%),
симптомы депрессии (21.7%),
нарушения сна (23.5%),
что значительно превышает показатели контрольной группы из числа лиц, не проживающих рядом с такими станциями - (10%), (5%), (5%), (0%), (8.8%) и(10%), соответственно.

Полный отчет на английском о вреде радиации от ретрансляторов, мобильников, ноутбуков, Wi-FI, других беспроводных приборов выложен здесь:

http://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BioInitiativeReport2012.pdf

и здесь

www.bioinitiative.org

BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Radiation at
December 31, 2012

[Олегович]

Спасибо, коллега.


Олегович
_________________
Все не так просто. Все просто не так!
*****
P.S. Да! ВОРЧЛИВЫЙ - это я!!!

[nata-ha]

Хочу присоединиться с вопросом. У нас в соседнем доме диспетчерская такси, насколько я понимаю у них там тоже какое-то оборудование должно стоять. Оно тоже относится к этой категории вредности?

[Leana]

[Leana]

http://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/2.jpg

[nata-ha]

Leana, спасибо за ответ. Да, с wi-fi дело плохо, у нас в квартире только сетей 10 обнаруживается, да и у самих тоже интернет через wi-fi настроен. Куда сейчас от него деться.. Да и за компьютерами многие целый день проводят, тоже ничего полезного...

[Leana]

http://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/5.jpg

[Leana]

С вай-фай элементарно перейти на проводной интернет! Установка вай-фай в французских школах теперь запрещена законом. Это частная лавочка, также как и пресловутый бренд Teflon, испускающий яд при нагревании.

[Leana]

[nata-ha]

[Leana]

Americans' brains being fried by cell towers: New scientific evidence reveals shocking extent of electropollution damage


Wednesday, March 26, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
Tags: cell towers, EMF pollution, mental confusion

(NaturalNews)
Exposure to cell phone towers alters brain function in alarming ways, causing a lack of concentration, irritability, difficulty sleeping and lack of appetite. That's the conclusion of a new study just published by the British Medical Journal.(1)

The study, authored by Professor Enrique A Navarro, concluded that the severity of such symptoms directly correlated to cell tower exposure levels. In other words, the closer a person lives to a cell tower, the greater the severity of their symptoms. This was true regardless of race, income level and other demographics.

Cell towers, of course, broadcast and receive electromagnetic switching signals. Human biology -- and the brain in particular -- relies on electro-biochemical pathways for healthy function. Many scientists have long suspected that chronic exposure to low levels of EMF pollution (electropollution) may interfere with healthy functioning of the brain and body. This latest research adds yet more support to that alarming idea.


It's not your imagination: Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is real

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity has long been dismissed as non-existent by some doctors and industry-funded scientists. After all, if EMF pollution from cell towers really does harm public health, then the implications are truly massive, both economically and in terms of human suffering.

But electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a genuine phenomenon. People are not "inventing" side effects or symptoms. As Navarro writes in the study:

The term electromagnetic hypersensitivity has been recently introduced in discussions attributing symptoms to exposure to EMFs. A review of this topic in 2010 found that 8 of the 10 studies evaluated through PubMed had reported increased prevalence of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer in populations living at distances < 500 m from [cell phone towers].

Importantly, all these symptoms were recorded in people living near cell phone towers whose broadcast signal strength meets current safety guidelines. As the study author points out, this most likely means current government guidelines on cell phone towers are inadequate to protect the public. Revising such guidelines could have drastic implications for the nationwide telecommunications infrastructure.

By the way, people who live fewer than 500 meters from cell phone towers appear to be especially at risk of electromagnetic interference with brain function. Because electropollution strength is determined by the inverse square of the distance, a person who moves twice as close to a cell tower experiences four times the radiation.


190,000 cell phone towers and growing
There are currently over 190,000 cell phone towers across the United States.(2)

Their typical "maximum range" is over 21 miles, meaning their electromagnetic pollution extends in a sphere with a radius of over 21 miles. (In reality, this pollution extends indefinitely, but the intensity of it drops off with the square of the distance.)

The following map shows AT&T coverage areas in orange. If you live inside an orange area, you are currently exposed to cell tower radiation.



People who live within range of two or more cell phone towers experience electropollution from all the towers within a range of 21 miles. This electropollution effect is cumulative.

It is not known how many Americans live within 21 miles of at least one cell tower, but given that over half the U.S. population lives in urban areas, it's safe to assume that at least 150 million -- and more likely close to 300 million -- Americans are exposed to EMF electropollution from cell towers.


Modern society increasingly confused, irritable and sleepless
Have you noticed how the mass public seems increasingly confused and irritable? A society that once operated with some degree of sanity and politeness has become largely demented and rude. Mathematical abilities are nearly lost across the population, as very few people under the age of 40 can even calculate 15% waiter's tips at a restaurant. The ability of voters to understand laws, liberties, freedom and even the structure of government is almost entirely lost in nations where cell phone towers are ubiquitous.

Given this recent research revealing the negative impact of cell phone radiation of human brain function, it would be incredibly irresponsible to fail to consider how cell tower radiation alters healthy brain function and promotes confusion and irritability. As more scientists look into this issue, we may indeed find that the fall of American civilization is being accelerated by electromagnetic pollution that leads to disastrous cognitive consequences across the population.

Sources for this article include:
1. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/12/e003836....
2. http://www.statisticbrain.com/cell-phone-tow...


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/044464_cell_towers_EMF_pollution_mental_confusion.html#ixzz2x9ng9wlI

[Leana]

Subjective symptoms related to GSM radiation from mobile phone base stations: a cross-sectional study

Claudio Gómez-Perretta1,
Enrique A Navarro2,
Jaume Segura3,
Manuel Portolés1

+ Author Affiliations

1Research Center, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain


2Department of Applied Physics, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain


3Department of Computer Sciences, ETSE-Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain

Correspondence to Professor Enrique A Navarro; enrique.navarro@uv.es
Received 16 August 2013
Revised 16 November 2013
Accepted 20 November 2013
Published 30 December 2013


Abstract


Objectives We performed a re-analysis of the data from Navarro et al (2003) in which health symptoms related to microwave exposure from mobile phone base stations (BSs) were explored, including data obtained in a retrospective inquiry about fear of exposure from BSs.


Design Cross-sectional study.


Setting La Ñora (Murcia), Spain.


Participants Participants with known illness in 2003 were subsequently disregarded: 88 participants instead of 101 (in 2003) were analysed. Since weather circumstances can influence exposure, we restricted data to measurements made under similar weather conditions.


Outcomes and methods A statistical method indifferent to the assumption of normality was employed: namely, binary logistic regression for modelling a binary response (eg, suffering fatigue (1) or not (0)), and so exposure was introduced as a predictor variable. This analysis was carried out on a regular basis and bootstrapping (95% percentile method) was used to provide more accurate CIs.


Results The symptoms most related to exposure were lack of appetite (OR=1.58, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.03); lack of concentration (OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.89); irritability (OR=1.51, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.85); and trouble sleeping (OR=1.49, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.84). Changes in –2 log likelihood showed similar results. Concerns about the BSs were strongly related with trouble sleeping (OR =3.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.86). The exposure variable remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. The bootstrapped values were similar to asymptotic CIs.


Conclusions This study confirms our preliminary results. We observed that the incidence of most of the symptoms was related to exposure levels—independently of the demographic variables and some possible risk factors. Concerns about adverse effects from exposure, despite being strongly related with sleep disturbances, do not influence the direct association between exposure and sleep.